Saturday, July 4, 2009

Cesearian Section With Anemia

New press article ...

... on the TV Public reflection Zuck Santiago Rosero appeared today in The Telegraph.

Taken from the print edition of July 4, 2009
of the public, little





Santiago Rosero

In talks Culture and Social Transformation on that developed last week in the FLACSO and USFQ participated, among other speakers, the Venezuelan sociologist Tulio Hernandez and the American academic George Yudice.
Landing today in our context, Yudice said that in an ideal scenario the closure of a television channel to serve as a catapult into space to replace the closed include locally produced content and choice, understood this as an opening to the plurality of information, the incentive independent production and the generation of a movement of divergent ways that are promoted with canned openings rating thirsty.
This, Tulio Hernandez countered by arguing that in Venezuela, following the closure of Radio Caracas Television, according to research by the Institute of Communication Studies, the inclusion of content premises in the new channel had decreased by 50%.
Yudice said that the statement was not a guarantee per se but a condition of possibility. It was that or the eternal clash with private means above all assess the economic potential of media products, but by no means a definitive guarantee.
The condition of possibility, in its development than rely on a technology platform available, would have to be encouraged by the design of a policy which set out policy frameworks that promote and protect local production and alternative, where the alternative should be directed to a dispute over space and construction of meanings rather than alternating with, or worse than a continuation of the establishment.
While Ecuador's TV is not the case of a canal that came to replace one closed, it is-or at least well conceived in the ideal, the effort to install the country's public television . However, the foundation of the public in order to promote local production and to enhance the visibility of individuals, processes and discourses traditionally excluded, far from being achieved much in its management. And only that the notion of the public lacks strength but old vices as arbitrary censorship have begun to settle into their grills program. Happened to Ecuadorian filmmakers work: the short Pia Javier Andrade, apart from having passed without their permission, we will cut off the "bad words" and recently, the documentary This damn country, Juan Martín Cueva, he curtailed the adjective.
Together
disrespect involving the alteration of a copyright work without his consent, there ECTV in the conduct of the more worrisome signs: the interference of a morality that seems to ingratiate susceptibility to any public that they have defined. The questions: Who or what will answer that moral censorship and restricts? "On behalf of the channel who speaks? What public means public broadcaster's editorial line?
As things stand, according to the bet Yudice, the condition of possibility for the public involves a dynamic contents from prudish morality in TVET is to balance negative.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Deleting Logins From Mac Facebook

this (damn) country in this damned country

Taken from the print edition of The Daily Telegraph of June 30, 2009

This [damn] country





Lucrecia Maldonado
lmaldonado@telegrafo.com.ec

There are things that have to censor. The morbidity. The stupidity. Pornography on time for all age groups. Sadistic violence in idem. The crime reports without reflection. Can not let certain things (not so much ideas, procedures, aberrations, these extremely dark and disturbing side of the human condition) moved there, shamelessly showing to people who may not ready to confront them with maturity and discretion. But

there to become Torquemadas of microorganisms that can occur around a large gap. Personally, I support that law applies in cases such as news spread based on assumptions that may ultimately lead to social unrest and easily lead to chaos. So unless you call attention or reconvenga firmly.

But when serial blasts as "The Simpsons" or self-censorship when exercised without opinion, yes I am thinking a while how the regulation of the media, rather, what we see and hear through them, has meaning and social function aimed towards the common good and not as a way to satisfy whims individual party or the moralizing platitudes cheaper and creeping.

"In that case, 'damn' is a word that hides anger, disappointment, but also love ..."
For example, the public channel Ecuador TV documentary presents Juan Martín Cueva "This damn country." But decide to 'amputate' the adjective. Why? What is the criterion that operates in the 'selection' language? Has anyone asked the author of the documentary if he agreed with the change? Moreover ... Someone asked the author why it was that adjective there, what role, how important is that one word in the name of the documentary?

Surely not. Somebody read the word 'damn', the equating and Disqualification and insult ... scissors, soon, urgent! To make matters worse, the adjective was calling the sacred word 'country'. And then, well, we passed the film, we support the national cinema, the notorious 'talent' national and breathe in peace because while we are defending the sacred concept of 'country' sneak attack of the adjective 'damn'. In years of college is learning (should learn) to read between the lines. It should come to understand connotative language that is a very serious sin to address the words and expressions from linear meaning without attending to the semantic nuances and variations. 'Cursed', in that case, is a word that hides anger, disappointment, but also love and desire to change what ails us as a society and individuals. Is it so hard to understand? Who should draw you an explanation that should be unnecessary? How do you handle something as big as the dissemination of cultural expressions of a country with the Manichean approach a child who has terrorized him from the womb with the possibility of the most excruciating tortures of hell if you sneeze in a church? First of all, I think the key is to open your mind and leave out the strainers that have suddenly begun to operate indiscriminately in this damn country.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Tibialis Posterior Tendonitis



this damned country was screened on Thursday, June 11 in theaters VERDI, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bas part of the second festival CINECUANON . Many films

Ecuadorian part of this exhibition, including a complete retrospective of the work of Sebastian Cordero , including rats, mice and robbers , Chronicles, and his documentary Viteri, a self .

fictions also projects These are not penalties of Anahi Hoeneisen and Daniel Andrade , When I touch myself of Victor Arregui, and How Far of Tania Hermida (which in those days earned an award in Austria: http://www.ecuadorinmediato.com/noticias/106378).
In documentary, Why die cast brown of Tito Molina, Baltazar Ushka, frozen time of José Antonio and Igor Guaysamín , Alfaro Vive Carajo, sleep chaos of Isabel Davalos, blow by blow of Galo Betancourt , Goerge Febres, of Orlando Ivo Huahua, among others.